D.8: Identify rationales for conducting comparative, component, and parametric analyses.
Free practice questions for this part of the BCBA, with an explanation for every option.
A BCBA has shown that breaks from work reduce escape-maintained aggression. She now compares 15-second, 60-second, and 3-minute breaks to find the shortest break that still keeps aggression low. What kind of analysis is this, and why is it done?
- A. A functional analysis, to identify the function of aggressionIncorrect. The function (escape) has already been identified. The question is now about how much of the treatment variable is needed.
- B. A comparative analysis, to decide whether breaks work better than an unrelated treatmentIncorrect. A comparative analysis pits two different interventions against each other, not different values of the same one.
- C. A component analysis, to identify which parts of a treatment package are necessaryIncorrect. A component analysis takes apart a package of separate procedures. Here a single variable is being varied in amount.
- D. A parametric analysis, to identify the most effective or efficient value of the independent variableCorrect. A parametric analysis systematically varies the value or magnitude of an independent variable to find which values work best and most efficiently.
A school uses a four-part treatment package (visual schedule, token economy, response cost, and daily parent notes) that has reduced a student's disruptions. Staff report the package takes too much time. What is the strongest rationale for running a component analysis?
- A. To find the best magnitude of the token exchange ratioIncorrect. Varying the value of one variable, such as the exchange ratio, is a parametric analysis.
- B. To find out whether the package works better than a different package used at another schoolIncorrect. Comparing this package to a different one is a comparative analysis.
- C. To identify which components are necessary and sufficient, so ineffective or unnecessary parts can be dropped and the package made more efficientCorrect. A component analysis (for example, drop-out or add-in) tests what each part contributes, which helps simplify the package and lower its response effort and cost.
- D. To show external validity by having different teachers run the packageIncorrect. Replicating with different implementers addresses generality. It does not tell you which components are doing the work.
A clinic director asks a BCBA to find out whether discrete-trial teaching or naturalistic incidental teaching leads to faster mand acquisition for its preschool learners, so the clinic can adopt one approach. Which type of analysis is this?
- A. Comparative analysisCorrect. A comparative analysis compares two or more distinct interventions to find out which is more effective or efficient, which is what the director wants.
- B. Component analysisA component analysis breaks down one treatment package to see which of its parts are responsible for the effect. Here, two separate treatments are being compared.
- C. Parametric analysisA parametric analysis varies the value of one independent variable (such as its amount or frequency). It does not compare different teaching methods.
- D. Functional analysisA functional analysis tests which consequences maintain a behavior. It is not used to choose between teaching approaches.